Interior Scroll
Artist
Carolee Schneemann
(American, 1939–2019)
Date1975 (negative); 2009 (print)
MediumGelatin silver print
Edition I/VII + 4 AP
DimensionsImage: 13 3/4 × 11 inches (34.9 × 27.9 cm);
Frame: 18 1/4 × 14 1/4 × 1 1/4 inches (46.4 × 36.2 × 3.2 cm)
Frame: 18 1/4 × 14 1/4 × 1 1/4 inches (46.4 × 36.2 × 3.2 cm)
ClassificationsPhotographs
Credit LineAcquired through the generosity of Peter Robbins, Class of 1974, and Jody Robbins
Terms
- Photographs
- Portfolio
- Gelatin silver prints
- Performances
- Women
- Nudity
- American
Object number2008.094 i
Label CopyCarolee Schneemann first performed “Interior Scroll” in East Hampton, New York, in August 1975. She entered the performance space wrapped in a white sheet and carrying a bucket of paint and brushes. After undressing, she ritualistically painted her body and read from her book Cezanne, She Was A Great Painter. Schneemann then slowly extracted a scroll from her vagina and read the text below, an excerpt from her Super 8 film “Kitch’s Last Meal.” The thirteen sequential photographs in this portfolio record her historic performance. “Interior Scroll” was performed a second and last time at the Telluride Film Festival, Colorado, in 1977.
“I thought of the vagina in many ways—physically, conceptually: as a sculptural form, and architectural referent, the source of sacred knowledge; ecstasy, birth passage, transformation. I saw the vagina as a translucent chamber of which the serpent was an outward model: enlivened by its passage from the visible to the invisible, a spiraled coil ringed with the shape of desire and generative mysteries, attributes of both female and male sexual powers. This source of ‘interior knowledge’ would be symbolized as the primary index unifying spirit and flesh in Goddess worship.” —Carolee Schneemann, 1975
Following is the text that Schneemann read from the scroll during her performance:
I met a happy man
a structuralist filmmaker
—but don’t call me that
it’s something else I do—
he said we are fond of you
you are charming
but don’t ask us
to look at your films
we cannot
there are certain films
we cannot look at
the personal clutter
the persistence of feelings
the hand-touch sensibility
the diaristic indulgence
the painterly mess
the dense gestalt
the primitive techniques
(I don’t take the advice
of men who only talk to
themselves)
PAY ATTENTION TO CRITICAL
AND PRACTICAL FILM LANGUAGE
IT EXISTS FOR AND IN ONLY
ONE GENDER
even if you are older than me
you are a monster I spawned
you have slithered out
of the excesses and vitality
of the sixties……..
he said you can do as I do
take one clear process
follow its strictest
implications intellectually
establish a system of
permutations establish
their visual set……..
I said my film is concerned
with DIET AND DIGESTION
very well he said then
why the train?
the train is DEATH as there
is die in diet and di in
digestion
then you are back to metaphors
and meanings
my work has no meaning beyond
the logic of its systems
I have done away with
emotion intuition inspiration—
those aggrandized habits which
set artists apart from
ordinary people—those
unclear tendencies which
are inflicted upon viewers……..
it’s true I said when I watch
your films my mind wanders
freely……………..
during the half hour of
pulsing dots I compose letters
dream of my lover
write a grocery list
rummage in the trunk
for a missing sweater
plan the drainage pipes for
the root cellar………..
it is pleasant not to be
manipulated
he protested
you are unable to appreciate
the system the grid
the numerical rational
procedures
the Pythagorean cues—
I saw my failings were worthy
of dismissal I’d be buried
alive my works lost………
he said we can be friends
equally tho we are not artists
equally I said we cannot
be friends equally and we
cannot be artists equally
he told me he had lived with
a “sculptress” I asked does
that make me a “film-makeress”?
“Oh no,” he said. “We think of you
as a dancer.”Collections